Science education put at risk by new Academies Act

CaSE Director Imran Khan has written a post for the New Scientist S-Word blog warning that the new Academies Act, which made it through parliament this week, has removed the obligation by new Academy schools to teach science and maths in line with the national curriculum. Under the previous government, Academy schools (publically-funded but independently-run schools) were required to teach science, maths, english and ICT, however this requirement has been removed by the new law.

As Imran points out, “More than 9 in 10 businesses employ people with skills in science, technology, engineering and maths, and two thirds of all employers report difficulty in recruiting enough of those workers. Leaving students without an understanding of these subjects doesn’t just deprive them of the enjoyment of science, but also seriously harms their career prospects – and the economy too”.

Posted in Coalition Government, Education, Skills | Leave a comment

Investing in Innovation: Venture Capital’s slump, and its impact on innovation

Yannis Pierrakis is Head of Investments Research at the National Endowment for Science Technology and the Arts (NESTA)

NESTA’s research shows that the 6 per cent of UK businesses with the highest growth rates generated half of the new jobs created by existing businesses between 2002 and 2008. Such young, innovative companies particularly need Venture Capital (VC) because they require significant capital up-front to develop new products in advance of sales. They tend to have intangible assets and ambitious growth plans that require large amounts of finance, show a significant delay before generating revenue and consequently entail high risk. As a result, debt finance is inappropriate – but venture capital is an alternative form of finance that is structured to address these challenges.

Creating new industries requires sustained investment over the long-term, continued commitment and long-term resources. The semiconductor and microcomputer industries are good examples of this lengthy and capital-intensive process. In both cases, it took up to ten years of continued risk capital investing before the industries properly took off. Virtually every other new industry since – biotechnology, personal computers, PC software, wireless communications, the Internet – have followed this pattern.

Read More »

Posted in Funding, Innovation | Leave a comment

Scientific Expertise on the S&T Committee

Last week saw the announcement of the eleven new members of the House of Commons Science & Technology Committee. The new chair of the Committee, Andrew Miller, blogged for CaSE on what he sees as the major challenges facing the committee.

Read More »

Posted in Conservatives, Labour, Liberal Democrats, STEM MPs, Science in Government, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Science & Technology in the new House of Commons

Andrew Miller MP is the newly elected Chair of the House of Commons Science and Technology Select Committee

I am delighted to have been elected as Chair of the Science and Technology Committee. I am sure readers will be interested to know that I was a member of Save British Science, and remain a member of CaSE.

I started my working life in the department of Geology in what is now Portsmouth University where I developed the XRD and XRF facilities. Much has changed since then – not least the way in which modern computing has radically improved the output of the lab. But the one constant (apart from Bragg’s law which was pretty fundamental to this work!) is the pressure on the science budget which I will touch on later.

Read More »

Posted in Conservatives, Labour, Liberal Democrats, S&T Committee, STEM MPs, Science in Government, Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Science in UK Government – Mind the Gap

Allan Sudlow is Relationships Manager for Science, Technology and Medicine at the British Library

For those concerned about the future of science in the UK under the new Government, it’s almost certainly a case of waiting and worrying, but we should not be passive.  This was the undercurrent to a recent debate – Science in UK Government: Where’s the Evidence – between Evan Harris (former Liberal Democrat MP and Science Spokesman) and Mark Henderson (Science Editor for the Times) as part of the TalkScience series at the British Library.

Read More »

Posted in Guest, Science & Society, Science in Government | Leave a comment

Labour leadership election; Scientists for Labour put their questions

Paul Connell is the Secretary of Scientists for Labour (SfL)

‘Scientists for Labour’ (SfL) is pleased to unveil the questions we’ll be formally asking the five Labour leadership candidates. They are:

1.      How can science, technology, engineering and mathematics contribute to economic growth in the face of current constraints on government spending?

2.      How will you bring expert scientific advice into Labour policy-making and the shadow cabinet, now that the party is in opposition?

3.      How will you promote the continuation of infrastructure regeneration in universities, schools and colleges to ensure that we inspire and train the scientists of the future?

Read More »

Posted in Guest, Labour, New government, Science in Government, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Early science and mathematics education: getting the basics right

Nick von Behr is the Education Policy Manager for the Royal Society.

The state of primary and early secondary science and maths education

We have a misleading picture of the health of teaching and learning of science and mathematics in schools. That is the conclusion of today’s Royal Society report on the state of primary and early secondary science and mathematics education in the UK.

While attainment trends generally indicate improvement over the past decade or so, research shows that teachers often lack the knowledge and skills required to teach science and mathematics well. Only 5% of primary teachers have a significant science or maths background. This problem, which is compounded by reliance on ‘teaching to the test’, may well be responsible for so many children being ‘switched off’ these subjects.

Read More »

Posted in Education, Mathematics, New government, Skills | 2 Comments

Gender Equality in SET

Annette Williams is Director of the UK Resource Centre for Women in SET (UKRC )

The language of struggle is common when talking about equality. Yes – it has been a struggle. And there is still much to be done. While progress has been made over 40 years of initiatives and modernisation, some of the current facts and figures about the participation of women scientists, engineers and technologists remain shocking.

This imbalance matters – not only for reasons of fairness, but because gender equality is good for business and innovation in science, engineering and technology (SET). It values and nurtures talent, builds a more inclusive and diverse workforce and can lead to better business performance, helping unlock economic recovery.

Read More »

Posted in Coalition Government, Education, Equality, Skills | Leave a comment

Science in Parliament – the new landscape

Martin Griffiths is an adviser at the Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology.

Science had a higher profile than ever in the run-up to the election, thanks to #scivote, the series of debates between Lord Drayson, Adam Afriyie and Evan Harris, and the launch of the Science Party. But in the immediate aftermath, the outlook for science in Parliament seemed gloomy.

None of the three science spokesmen retained their brief, with Harris even losing his seat, and long-time advocates like Brian Iddon, Doug Naysmith, Phil Willis and Ian Taylor all retiring. But there are still around 70 MPs with a STEM degree, including some interesting new faces, and we’re now getting an idea of who the main players in science in this Parliament will be.

Read More »

Posted in Conservatives, Education, Election, Guest, Labour, Liberal Democrats, New government, Science in Government | 1 Comment

Educating tomorrow’s engineers – the Coalition’s policies

Hugo Donaldson is Principal Policy Adviser at the Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)

The skills shortage

The UK suffers from a substantial shortage of engineers, as the IET’s annual skills survey indicates. These skills shortages will have to be addressed if we are to meet national challenges such as mitigating climate change and re-balancing the economy with a greater role for manufacturing.

The new government is aware of the problem. The new Education Secretary, Michael Gove, has spoken repeatedly about the importance of science, technology, engineering and mathematics education. So too have the Science and Universities Minister, David Willetts, and the Minister for Skills, John Hayes.

But what will they actually do? In some areas, policies have already been announced and a picture is emerging. In other areas, the direction the new government will take has yet to be decided, and the engineering profession must push its case.

Read More »

Posted in Engineering, Funding, Guest, New government, Skills, Uncategorized | 2 Comments

CaSE Director Imran Khan’s remarks at Parliamentary Links Day

CaSE Director Imran Khan spoke to delegates at today’s Parliamentary Links Day, setting out CaSE’s priorities for the new Parliament. A transcript of his speech is below:

Read More »

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Science, the New Parliament & the Budget

Science and the New Parliament preceded (and slightly overlapped with) the budget today. It was organised by the Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) with the support of many other organisations, including CaSE.

Speakers came from across science and engineering to discuss the importance of working together with parliament and government to develop public policy. Imran Khan, CaSE Director, outlined CaSE’s current priorities and spoke of the need to work positively to engage and support incoming MPs.

A range of government and parliamentary speakers contributed their thoughts, including John Bercow, Speaker of the House, who opened the proceedings, Mark Lancaster, longtime supporter of the RSC’s work, Malcolm Wicks, former science minister, and Professor Sir John Beddington, Chief Scientific Adviser (CSA).

Read More »

Posted in Coalition Government, Conservatives, Engineering, Funding, Labour, Liberal Democrats, Ministerial Code, New government, Policies, STEM MPs, Science & Society, Science in Government, Scientific Advice | 1 Comment

To plug the budget deficit we must invest in science and engineering

CaSE Director Imran Khan  wrote an article in yesterday’s Guardian newspaper, calling on the government to throw its weight behind sectors that deliver economic growth in order to reduce the budget deficit, particularly science and engineering.

As Khan argues, research and development (R&D) in Britain’s private sector relies heavily on public support for education, research and industry. To make the most of the UK’s scientific and engineering potential, and to use that potential to fight the deficit, the government needs to set out a clear, long-term plan for  investment in this sector. Efficiency savings can be made, just as in other sectors, but  it is vital that any savings are reinvested back into science and engineering.

Business leaders from some of Britain’s biggest high-tech companies – whose total R&D spend is more than twice the government’s science budget –  came together this week to underline this point in a letter coordinated by CaSE.

CaSE has also published a pre-budget briefing arguing that if your aim is to cut the budget deficit, you need to spend more on education, research and development – and certainly not less.

Posted in Coalition Government, Education, Funding, Innovation, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Industry leaders make the business case for science

In a letter to The Times newspaper, published today, senior figures from some of the UK’s top science and engineering firms made the case for continued public support for science and engineering. Between them, the companies account for almost a third of all corporate spending on R&D in the UK – more than twice the Government’s science budget.

The letter was instigated and coordinated by the Campaign for Science and Engineering. It is available on the The Times website, and reads:

Sir, The UK’s private sector invests £16 billion in research and development and employs 150,000 people. Our companies are careful about where they invest. We value the scientific and engineering talent that flows from the UK’s world-class universities and publicly funded research base, and how the tax regime supports research and development investment.

Scientists, engineers, and multinational companies will focus their pursuits in countries with the most favourable intellectual, financial and political environments.

High-skills industries are where the future lies. Demographic and socio-economic change in the EU and beyond means that this country will continue to become less competitive in low-skilled sectors. Our competitor nations recognise these trends and are rapidly investing in high-tech infrastructures.

The UK has an opportunity to drive future economic growth through science and engineering. To do so, the Government needs a clear, strong and long-term strategy for making the UK the most attractive country for companies to conduct research and development. This includes investing in education and public sector research, so that highly skilled graduates and technicians in science, technology, engineering and mathematics are nurtured in the UK.

Such a stable and positive policy environment would give private research and development investors the confidence to undertake long-term projects here, helping to grow the UK’s economy into one that is truly modern and innovative, with strength and security from a diversity of sectors.

Dr Mike Bushell, Principal Scientific Adviser, Syngenta

Jane Cannon, Group managing director, Lockheed Martin UK

Dr Chris Francis, Government affairs, IBM

Dr Mene Pangalos, Executive Vice-president innovative medicines, AstraZeneca R&D

Dr David Roblin, Senior Vice-president, R&D, Pfizer

Neil Scott, Vice-president, engineering, Airbus UK

Dr Patrick Vallance, Senior Vice-president, drug discovery, GlaxoSmithKline

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Interview with the Science Minister

The new Universities and Science Minister, David Willetts has given an interview to Mark Henderson of the Times, ahead of the Cheltenham Science Festival, on the importance of independent scientific advice in government. You can view the Times’ article here, as well as an extended version of the interview on Mark’s blog.

In the interview Willetts underlines his support for evidence-based policy making in Government and has pressed for ministers to respect independent advice. “To convey the seriousness of what we are doing and its credibility, it is really important where possible we do pilot, evaluate, publish evidence, have it tested,” he said. “We must also have sufficient confidence that when evidence starts coming in that something is not working, to be willing to change.”

Following discussions with the Government Chief Scientific Adviser, John Beddington, principles that give expert advisers the right to disagree publicly with government policy have been incorporated into the code of practice for ministers, and will be published shortly. Speaking about the principles, Willetts said “It was important because the scientific community placed value on it, and that’s true, but it’s even more important because we all have an interest in good decision-taking.”

Willetts also spoke about the wider uses of the scientific method; ” I personally think that as society has become more diverse, with a greater range of religious and cultural traditions, evidence-based arguments drawing on scientific method are one of the most important ways we have of reaching common conclusions because it’s a universal.”

CaSE Director Imran Khan cautiously welcomed his comments, saying “Evidence-based policy-making isn’t just a philosophical approach; it’s a pragmatic one too, especially when money is tight. So it’s a great statement of Government intent for a senior minister to be advocating pilot schemes and evaluation of evidence wherever possible. CaSE will be asking Government to use exactly this approach if they change funding for research and development; any shifts in support need to be evidence-based and properly evaluated.”

“It’s also a welcome and vital step that the relationship between scientists and ministers has been codified. But there will still be concern that requirements for the nebulous quality of ‘mutual trust’ give politicians a carte blanche to unfairly dismiss their advisers.”

In the interview, Willetts also registered his support for next Tuesday’s science induction session for new MPs , run by the Parliamentary Office for Science and Technology (POST), which he hopes will help develop an interest in science among the new intake of MPs.

The Science Minister will be taking part in a Science Question Time event tomorrow (Thursday 11th June) at 5pm, which Mark Henderson will also be taking part in.

Posted in Ministerial Code, New government, Science & Society, Science in Government, Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Labour Science Spokesperson – An Update

Following Imran’s Khan blog on the S-Word, which called for the swift appointment of a science spokesperson for Labour, CaSE now understands that this appointment will take several months.

The rules of the Labour Party state that members of the shadow cabinet must be voted for by the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP), that is, the collective body of Labour MPs.

The election of the shadow cabinet will take place during parliamentary time, and can only happen after the election of the Party Leader at Labour’s annual conference in September. There are 19 shadow cabinet vacancies up for grabs and any MP can stand, although the current rules state that at least four of those vacancies must be filled by a woman. Each member of the PLP has 19 votes and there is a first past the post system in place. Only once the shadow cabinet is in place can the new leader formally assign the science brief to someone.

As Imran identified in his blog, “Science policy debate in Westminster seems to be in a state of suspended animation”. However, until a formal shadow science minister is appointed, Pat McFadden, Shadow Secretary of State for the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, will be speaking for science and engineering. CaSE was pleased to meet him yesterday and discuss some of the pressing issues following on from the Queens’ speech.

Posted in Labour, Science in Government | Leave a comment

Science & Technology Select Committee returns

Great news from the House of Commons today – it’s been confirmed that the Science & Technology (S&T) Select Committee will be re-formed for the new Parliament.

Before the election, the Select Committee did a fantastic job of scrutinising Government and public policy across a range of issues relating to science, engineering, and technology. CaSE wrote to the new Leader of the House, Sir George Young, asking for it to be reformed – so we’re very pleased that it’s back.

You can see old reports from the S&T committee here.

We don’t yet know what the membership of the committee will be, but MPs today voted to confirm that the new Chair will be selected from the Labour party, which means that it won’t be headed by an MP from one of the governing parties (although select committee chairs have a reputation for being fiercely independent regardless of political background anyway).

Read More »

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

The Queen’s speech: cap on migrants, science education, and Lords reform

Science tends to get on fairly well without legislation and lawmaking, so we weren’t anticipating a lot of science or engineering news from the Queen’s Speech this morning. But there are three issues which we’d like to flag up for your attention; the cap on economic migrants, schools reform, and possible reform to the House of Lords.

These potential reforms are in their early stages, but we’d be keen to hear what you think CaSE’s response should be. You can either leave a comment on the blog, or email me at imran[at-nospam]sciencecampaign.org.uk

Migrant Cap

The Queen said that her Government will “limit the number of non-European Union economic migrants entering the United Kingdom”. This is part of the coalition’s aim of reducing migration to “tens of thousands, not hundreds of thousands”.

Read More »

Posted in Uncategorized | 7 Comments

First Coalition Cuts: Universities take a hit

George Osborne introduced the first round of £6.24 billion of coalition cuts today, identifying many areas of “waste” and “low value spending”. David Laws was left to fill out the detail of the cuts. Many of the cuts clearly go beyond natural wastage and into areas with serious implications for future economic growth. It would be extremely helpful to have a clearer rationale for why certain areas were targeted.

CaSE will be following up on the announcements, outlined below, to understand the detail better. We will also be working hard to make sure that science and engineering, teaching, research and innovation are defended from the next series of announcements in the budget on June 22nd.

Read More »

Posted in Coalition Government, Funding, Innovation, New government, Policies, Skills, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Science in the Cabinet

The Cabinet Office today released the new Ministerial Code, as well as details on the new Cabinet Committee System. There’s interesting news for science and engineering in both documents.

The Ministerial Code

The Code sets out the over-arching duties which Government Ministers must abide by. Section 5.2 says;

Ministers have a duty to give fair consideration and due weight to informed and impartial advice from civil servants, as well as to other considerations and advice in reaching policy decisions, and should have regard to the Principles of Scientific Advice to Government.

Read More »

Posted in Coalition Government, Ministerial Code, Science in Government, Scientific Advice | Leave a comment